Difference between revisions of "Space Based Solar Power"

From Spacepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Exoplatz.org>Strangelv
m (Strangelv moved page Space based solar power to Space Based Solar Power: capitalization)
Exoplatz.org>Hkhenson
Line 21: Line 21:
 
The UK government has determined that 3.5% discount is proper for projects of this kind.  Using 3.5%, the electric cost comes out at just over 1.5 cents per kWh and ~100,000 to one.  Extending the accounting period to 30 years at 3.5% brings the cost of power down to 1.24 cents per kWh and a cost of power to cost of investment ratio to ~130,000 to one.  It's a live spreadsheet, try your own numbers.  A ratio of 80,000 to one is conservative.
 
The UK government has determined that 3.5% discount is proper for projects of this kind.  Using 3.5%, the electric cost comes out at just over 1.5 cents per kWh and ~100,000 to one.  Extending the accounting period to 30 years at 3.5% brings the cost of power down to 1.24 cents per kWh and a cost of power to cost of investment ratio to ~130,000 to one.  It's a live spreadsheet, try your own numbers.  A ratio of 80,000 to one is conservative.
  
== Mass of power satellites ==
+
= PS Types =
  
 +
 +
== PV ==
 +
 +
 +
== Thermal ==
 +
 +
== Common considerations (Mass) ==
 
The original studies done in the late 1970s came up with a mass of ~10 kg/kW.  More recent realistic studies have averaged around 7 kg/kW.  A few studies have proposed designs under one tenth of a kg/kW.  Very light designs require a lot of station keeping against light pressure where designs in excess of 5 kg/kW can average the light pressure over a year.  Because a substantial fraction of the construction cost is for transport to GEO, the mass of a power satellite is an important number as is the lift cost to GEO.  This analysis will use 6.5 kg/kW.  The number can be adjusted in the spreadsheets.
 
The original studies done in the late 1970s came up with a mass of ~10 kg/kW.  More recent realistic studies have averaged around 7 kg/kW.  A few studies have proposed designs under one tenth of a kg/kW.  Very light designs require a lot of station keeping against light pressure where designs in excess of 5 kg/kW can average the light pressure over a year.  Because a substantial fraction of the construction cost is for transport to GEO, the mass of a power satellite is an important number as is the lift cost to GEO.  This analysis will use 6.5 kg/kW.  The number can be adjusted in the spreadsheets.
 +
 +
= Transport =
 +
 +
== Earth to LEO ==
 +
 +
== Skylon ==
 +
 +
== SpaceX ==
 +
 +
== LEO to GEO ==
 +
 +
== Engines ==
 +
 +
== Arcjet ==
 +
 +
== VSMIR ==
 +
 +
== Power ==
 +
 +
== Rectenna ==
 +
 +
== Ground transmitter ==
 +
 +
  
  
  
 
[[Category:Earth Orbit]]
 
[[Category:Earth Orbit]]

Revision as of 16:41, 3 May 2015

The Wikipedia's take on the topic is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power

Power Satellites Economics

In the absence of other forces such as legal requirements, power satellites compete in the energy market. Energy, particularly electrical energy, is the ultimate standard commodity. When a customer plugs in a toaster, energy is just there. At the end of the month, they pay the bill at the rate set by the state corporation commission. One level up, the power companies are hemmed in by regulations that they buy (or make) the lowest cost electricity, with exceptions that they have to purchase certain amounts of renewable power.

Space based solar power is renewable. That should make it easier to sell power from space at a premium. However, governmental energy polity changes unpredictably over time. An alternative would be a "design to cost" where the target cost of power is low enough to get a large market share without government intervention. Competing on cost is the way discount suppliers of many commodities obtained a substantial market share. (Examples, Southwest Airlines, GIECO, Charles Schawb.)

Levelized cost of power

The formula for the levelized cost of electricity is here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

The below spreadsheet assumes $1,600,000 per MW as the initial cost and 10% per year of the cost for maintenance. Power satellites run supplying base load, here assumed ~91% of the time, it may be higher.

The discount rate used in the model is 6.8%, same as the government uses for other sources. The accounting period is 20 years and no salvage value is assumed.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wDvn369EudkYGsPK3jNt4FmBFpNFtt0ZwDZl_lt_SNM/edit#gid=1481425448

The ratio between the $1600/kW cost and the cost that comes out of the formula (~2 cents per kWh) is close enough to 80,000 to one. Electric power cost is proportional to the cost of a power satellite (or any power source that has no fuel cost) in this ratio for this discount rate and years of service.

The UK government has determined that 3.5% discount is proper for projects of this kind. Using 3.5%, the electric cost comes out at just over 1.5 cents per kWh and ~100,000 to one. Extending the accounting period to 30 years at 3.5% brings the cost of power down to 1.24 cents per kWh and a cost of power to cost of investment ratio to ~130,000 to one. It's a live spreadsheet, try your own numbers. A ratio of 80,000 to one is conservative.

PS Types

PV

Thermal

Common considerations (Mass)

The original studies done in the late 1970s came up with a mass of ~10 kg/kW. More recent realistic studies have averaged around 7 kg/kW. A few studies have proposed designs under one tenth of a kg/kW. Very light designs require a lot of station keeping against light pressure where designs in excess of 5 kg/kW can average the light pressure over a year. Because a substantial fraction of the construction cost is for transport to GEO, the mass of a power satellite is an important number as is the lift cost to GEO. This analysis will use 6.5 kg/kW. The number can be adjusted in the spreadsheets.

Transport

Earth to LEO

Skylon

SpaceX

LEO to GEO

Engines

Arcjet

VSMIR

Power

Rectenna

Ground transmitter